🐙
Git Developer Guide
About
  • Overview
  • Scope of this book
  • Table of Content
  • 🐢Introduction to Version Control
    • What is Version Control?
    • Overview of git and it's benefits
    • Setting up Git on Different Platforms
  • 🍼Git Fundamentals
    • Initialising a new Git repository
    • Understanding the Git Workflow
    • Committing Changes and Writing Good Commit Messages
    • Viewing and Navigating Commit History
    • Git Basics - Practice Scenarios
      • Initialising a Git Repository
      • Committing Changes
      • Exploring Commit History
      • Amending and Undoing Commits
  • 🦕Working With Git
    • What is Git Branch?
    • Creating and Switching Between Branches
    • Merging Branches and Resolving Conflicts
    • Best Practices for Branch Management
    • Git Workflows
    • Git Log
    • Git Stash
    • Working with Git - Practice Scenarios
      • Creating and Switching Between Branches
      • Merging Branches and Resolving Conflicts
      • Branching Strategies in a Team Project
      • Rolling Back to a Previous Version
      • Experimenting with Feature Branches
      • Working with Stash
  • 🤝Working with Remote Repositories
    • Cloning a Repository from Remote
    • Pushing and Pulling Changes to and from Remote Repositories
    • Collaborative Workflows - Forking, Branching, and Pull Requests
    • Resolving Conflicts in a Collaborative Environment
    • Collaborating with Git - Practice Scenarios
      • Cloning a Remote Repository
      • Pushing and Pulling Changes
      • Collaborative Workflow with Forking and Pull Requests
      • Resolving Conflicts in a Pull Request
  • 🏆Advanced Git Features
    • Aliases and Custom Configurations
    • Working with Tags and Releases
    • Rewriting Commit History with Interactive Rebase
    • Utilising Git Hooks for Automation
    • Advanced Git Features - Practice Scenarios
      • Creating Custom Git Aliases
      • Working with Tags and Releases
      • Rewriting Commit History with Interactive Rebase
      • Using Git Hooks for Automated Testing
  • 😎Git in Real-World
    • Managing a Project with Multiple Contributors
    • Integrating Git with Continuous Integration, Continuous Deployment (CI, CD)
    • Versioning Assets with Git LFS (Large File Storage)
    • Deploying a Web Application using Git
    • Git In Real World - Practice Scenarios
      • Managing a Project with Multiple Contributors
      • Integrating Git with CICD Pipelines
      • Versioning Assets with Git LFS
      • Deploying a Web Application using Git
  • Git Troubleshooting
    • Common Mistakes and Pitfalls When Using Git
    • Undoing Changes with Git - Reverting and Resetting
    • Recovering Lost Commits or Branches
    • Dealing with Repository Corruption or Other Issues
  • Git Best Practices and Tips
    • Creating efficient git workflows: writing clean code for faster reviews
    • The importance of clean code in collaborative development
    • Significance of consistent naming conventions & coding Standards
    • Good code documentation for better git workflows
    • Writing meaningful git commit messages
    • Atomic commits in git & it's benefits for software teams
    • Structuring code & managing dependencies for better git workflows
    • Git branching strategies for software teams
  • Conclusion & Next Steps
    • Recap of Key Concepts and Commands
    • Further Resources for Expanding Git Knowledge
    • Encouragement and Tips for Continued Learning and Practice
  • License Considerations
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • How Atomic Commits Aid in Tracking Changes, Reverting Code, and Collaborating:
  • Examples of Breaking Down Changes into Smaller, Logical Commits:

Was this helpful?

  1. Git Best Practices and Tips

Atomic commits in git & it's benefits for software teams

Atomic commits refer to the practice of breaking down changes into smaller, self-contained units of work. Each commit represents a discrete and logical change to the codebase.

Atomic commits have the following benefits:

Clarity and Readability: Atomic commits make it easier for other developers (and your future self) to understand the changes made to the code. Each commit should have a clear and concise purpose, which helps in quickly grasping the modifications.

Granular Tracking of Changes: By having smaller, focused commits, you can track the history of changes in a more granular way. This makes it simpler to pinpoint when and why a specific change was introduced, aiding in debugging and troubleshooting.

Reverting Changes: If a particular commit introduces an issue or a bug, reverting that specific commit is straightforward. This prevents the need to undo an entire series of changes, which might include unrelated updates.

Easier Code Review: Smaller commits are easier to review. Reviewers can provide more specific feedback on each individual change, leading to a more efficient and constructive code review process.

Safer Collaboration: When multiple developers are working on the same codebase, atomic commits reduce the risk of conflicts. Different developers can work on different features or components independently without stepping on each other's toes.

Versioning and Release Management: With atomic commits, it becomes easier to manage versioning and create releases. You can cherry-pick specific commits to include in a release or exclude problematic commits if needed.


How Atomic Commits Aid in Tracking Changes, Reverting Code, and Collaborating:

Tracking Changes: Atomic commits provide a clear and organised history of the project's development. The commit messages should be descriptive, summarizing what each change accomplishes. Developers can use git log or other Git tools to visualize the commit history, making it easy to see the evolution of the codebase.

Reverting Code: If a commit introduces an unexpected bug or undesired behavior, you can use git revert to create a new commit that undoes the changes introduced by the problematic commit. This keeps the commit history intact and allows you to address issues more surgically.

Collaboration: When collaborating with other developers, atomic commits minimize the chances of merge conflicts. Developers can work on separate branches, and when they're ready to merge their changes into the main branch, Git will attempt to merge only the specific atomic commits.


Examples of Breaking Down Changes into Smaller, Logical Commits:

Consider a scenario where you are implementing a new feature for an online store. Instead of making a single large commit with all the changes, you can break it down into smaller, logical commits:

  1. Commit 1: Add database schema for new feature

  2. Commit 2: Implement backend API endpoints for the new feature

  3. Commit 3: Create frontend UI components for the new feature

  4. Commit 4: Integrate backend and frontend for the new feature

This approach makes it easier for others to understand the changes and helps in effective code reviews. It also allows you to revert or modify specific parts of the feature if needed, without affecting the entire implementation.

PreviousWriting meaningful git commit messagesNextStructuring code & managing dependencies for better git workflows

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?